Limits urged to super tax concessionality

"funds management"

15 April 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation fund members should only be entitled to tax concessionality on those sums necessary to generate an appropriate retirement benefit, according to a senior superannuation industry executive.

The chief executive of Pillar Administration, Peter Brook has used a column in an upcoming edition of Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, to argue for both limits to tax concessionality and inhibitors to the use superannuation as an estate planning tool.

He said there was a need to ensure that superannuation is a tax effective environment only for its purpose and to reasonable limits.

"While I support the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Retirement Standard recommendations, the principle remains relevant at other levels. Prior to retirement, I'd like to see all earnings over this sum returned to the member and taxed at marginal rates on a regular, say, half yearly basis," Brook said.

"The only sums that should have any shelter, at 15 per cent, are those necessary to generate the appropriate retirement benefit. The remainder needs to be taxed in the hands of the member.

He said that for those who might already have a higher balance, there could be a grace period to return those sums to the member — "let's say the distribution of surplus benefits within one year of implementation, and for this transition there would be a concessional tax of 15 per cent". "Thereafter, it would be returned at the marginal rate of the taxpayer. This should apply to all member balances, whether in managed super funds or self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs)," Brook said. "These returned funds will then be invested in other areas, not sheltered by the superannuation tax environment."

"For those in retirement, the existing tax free character of retirement benefits should continue, but all additional income should be taxed at the relevant marginal rates taking account of the totality of the income. So if a retiree receives $80,000 retirement benefit from super and receives another $20,000 outside of super then there would be no tax on the first sum but the additional income would be taxed at 37 cents in the dollar under current tax rates."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

7 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 12 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 10 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 13 hours ago