Soaring demand sways advice firm to charge for additional meetings
Soaring client demand for face-to-face meetings with advisers has resulted in a Melbourne-based advice firm imposing a fee for meetings beyond the number allotted in its review agreements.
Scott Haywood, director of Haywood Financial Planning, said the fee is now imposed if a client wants to see a planner for advice outside of their review agreement.
He said this was imposed because of the growing number of clients that were asking to see an adviser more often, and the impact that this was potentially having on resources.
“Instead of once a year or twice a year, clients now often want to come in every two months.”
He said demand was generally being driven by clients looking for additional advice on the current state of the market and what impact it will have on their retirement.
By the same token, Haywood said the firm does not want any dormant or any inactive clients because of the compliance risks.
“If we don’t see our clients at least annually then we will write to them and say that unless they contact us they may be appointed to an adviser external to our firm.
“There is a compliance risk to the practice if you have a big basket of clients that you are not servicing and yet earning income from.”
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
