Mixed views on regulation costs
A study commissioned by the Australian Securities and Investments Commissions (ASIC) and the Finance Industry Council of Australia into the cost of compliance has found most people surveyed believe the cost of compliance was high and could be reduced if the quality of the regulatory process were improved.
The study, the results of which were released today, nonetheless found that respondents had a positive attitude towards the notion of regulatory oversight, believing that benefits accrued to both their organisations and the market in general.
It said the main concerns identified by the study were with respect to the poor implementation of some regulation, the belief that some regulation was unnecessary and the difficulty experienced in managing regulatory requirements.
The study said compliance costs were generally accepted and most respondents regarded them as not only inevitable but also integral to maintaining consumer confidence and enhancing business regulation within the financial sector.
“Although compliance costs are perceived to be high, most readily admitted to not having a complete picture of how much their ongoing compliance activities are costing them overall and many perceived little value in doing so given the system to track compliance costs comprehensively would be expensive and would not be able to be used for business purposes,” it said.
ASIC said it would use the findings of the survey to engage in further dialogue with industry.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled a Sydney AFSL for failing to pay a $64,000 AFCA determination related to inappropriate advice, which then had to be paid by the CSLR.
A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments for investments.
Inefficient data processes and systems mean advisers are spending over half of their time on product implementation and administration at the expense of clients, according to research.
With the regulator announcing its enforcement focus for 2025 last week, law firm Hall & Wilcox examines the areas which have dropped down the list in priority for the regulator.
