CBA to pay $5m

commonwealth bank CBA Federal Court of Australia ASIC daniel crennan Royal Commission

9 June 2020
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) has been ordered by the Federal Court of Australia to pay a $5 million penalty due to breaches of the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) Act and Corporations Act for failures in their AgriAdvantage Plus Package. 

It was also ordered to publish a corrective notice in the form determined by the court. 

From May 2005 to December 2015, CBA sold customers the package which entitled them to benefits such as the fee waivers, interest rate discounts and bonus interest on savings, in exchange for the payment of package fees on 22 CBA products. 

ASIC alleged and CBA admitted that: 

  • Contrary to the terms of the package, CBA did not provide certain benefits to customers and, as a result, customers were overcharged fees and interest on loans and fees, and underpaid interest on savings. CBA also overcharged package fees to certain customers; 
  • The causes of CBA’s failures included the highly manual nature of CBA’s systems by which the package benefits were applied as well as CBA having no systems or processes in place to check whether customers were receiving benefits; and 
  • A total of 8,659 customers were impacted by CBA’s conduct on 131,542 occasions, in circumstances where CBA benefited from a total of $8,087,276.23 in incorrectly charged fees and interest on loans, and underpaid interest on savings. 
  • In his decision, Justice Beach had found: 
  • CBA had breached its obligation to do all things necessary to ensure financial services covered by its Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence were provided fairly, honestly and efficiently. 
  • The contraventions arose out of CBA’s failure to establish and maintain systems and processes to ensure that it could provide the benefits from the package in accordance with its terms and conditions. 
  • Although ASIC had sought only penalties and declarations as to CBA’s contraventions during the penalty period, the seriousness of those contraventions was to be viewed in the context of CBA’s failings for the broader period of over 10 years; and 
  • A pecuniary penalty of $5 million was appropriate having regard to the number of contraventions, the prejudice to customers, the duration of the contraventions and the inadequacy of CBA’s internal systems and processes. 

Daniel Crennan, ASIC deputy chair, said ASIC considered CBA’s conduct in this matter, which was examined in detail during the Financial Services Royal Commission, was the result of inadequate systems and processes.  

“Because of its conduct, CBA failed to deliver its AgriAdvantage package efficiently, honestly and fairly as it was obliged to do under s912A of the Corporations Act. As a result, over 8,000 customers were affected,” Crennan said. 

ASIC commenced proceedings against CBA on 16 March, 2020. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS