Blends are OK, but why aren’t diversity panels diverse?

Outsider diversity

19 March 2021
| By Outsider |
image
image
expand image

Outsider is pleased that, even though it took too long, the issue of diversity has become an important matter for many financial services firms, on the surface at least.

Outsider has noticed the increasing number of webinars dedicated to diversity, though mostly tackling gender diversity.

During one such webinar a panel discussed the number of female CEOs in the ASX 200, and workforce barriers for women.

After an audience member questioned the panel about the additional barriers faced by women from ethnic backgrounds and how firms could overcome the lack of non-white female women in executive roles, it was clear to Outsider that this particular issue was beyond the panel’s expertise.

Why? For the simple reason that the panel looked, well, uniformly Caucasian. While the panel were respected high-level women from various sectors, it appeared to Outsider none of their backgrounds could help them in providing views on how the issues of colour or ethnicity could be tackled.

This is not the first time Outsider has encountered panel discussions where the participants discussed diversity but were not particularly diverse themselves. Dammit, Outsider confesses to having been on some of those panels and his experience of diversity is limited to single malt versus blend.

Outsider reminds the industry that while gender diversity is incredibly important, diversity also included ethnic backgrounds, age, disability status, sexual orientation, gender identity, socio-economic background, caring responsibilities, intersex status, and religious affiliation and, ahem, not Speyside versus highland.

Outsider wonders whether webinar fatigue could be overcome with more inclusivity to stand out against all the beige or, dear he suggest, white. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS