APRA issues revised standards

australian-prudential-regulation-authority/risk-management/chairman/

19 May 2005
| By Carmen Watts |

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has issued a revised set of corporate governance draft standards covering the institutions it administers.

The chairman of APRA, John Laker announced the regulator’s intention to release the revised governance standard when addressing a conference earlier this week saying they would set out the key principles which regulated institutions should have regard to in their governance arrangements.

He said they would establish minimum standards on matters such as independence and board composition but that a key proposal contained in the new standard would be that each board have a policy on board renewal that “ensures that the board remains open to new ideas and independent thinking, while retaining adequate expertise”.

“We will not stipulate any specific requirements in these policies and we will not be setting a limit on tenure, as we had originally proposed,” Laker said. “Rather, as part of our normal supervision, we will be reviewing the approach each board takes to provide regularly for fresh insight and general reinvigoration of the board while ensuring continuity and experience at board level.”

He said APRA would also be proposing that each board have procedures for assessing its performance and that of individual directors (as well as senior managers) relative to its objectives.

“Again, we will not be stipulating any specific requirements but let me offer some guidance on how boards might go about this task,” Laker said. “We would expect each board to consider and document the objectives that it sets for the board collectively and for individual directors.”

He said objectives for the board could include establishing the overall strategy for the institution and ensuring reporting against this strategy; determining the risk appetite for the institution and approving its risk management strategy; assessing operating and financial conditions against forecasts; probing management on performance against plan and on the effectiveness of risk controls; and making key decisions in a timely manner.

“Objectives for individual directors could be set in terms of expertise and whether it is being demonstrated; attendance at board meetings; and contribution to board deliberations and the overall direction of the institution,” Laker said.

“We would expect assessments against these various objectives to take place on a regular basis (at least annually), either through an appraisal by the board itself or assessment by an external consultant.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 day 6 hours ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

6 days 5 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND