Some planners under-estimating self-licensing pitfalls

advisers australian unity financial planning australian financial services chief executive risk management

13 October 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Many planners who opt for self-licensing are seriously under-estimating the workload associated with maintaining an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL) according to Australian Unity Personal Financial Services chief executive, Steve Davis.

Davis has pointed to the number of advisers seeking to move from self-licensed status to under the Australian Unity brand and claimed that many have been spending up to a third of their time dealing with compliance issues around maintaining an AFSL.

"We have had a few previously self-licensed advisers join us recently, as well as a few others who are currently in talks with us, and they have all complained about the huge additional workload caused by the self-licensing responsibilities," he said.

"These advisers typically say they were spending nearly one-third of their time working on administration, compliance and risk management tasks just to maintain their licence, instead of spending time in front of clients or growing their business," Davis said.

He said the opportunity cost for these advisers was significant and, in addition to that, they had discovered that the direct costs of maintaining their licence were higher than the fees they now paid to Australian Unity to provide compliance and administration solutions for them.

Davis acknowledged that the trend to self-licensing had accelerated lately with both advisers and accountants heading down the path amid increasing perceptions that it was simple, cheap and easy to operate their own AFSL.

However he warned those advisers and accountants who were thinking ‘I'll try self-licensing for a few years and if it doesn't suit me I'll just relinquish my licence' that they needed to understand the back-end implications of liability and PI insurance.

"A big shock for advisers handing back their license is that they are still exposed to client claims against their licence for a further seven years," Davis said "So they need to purchase PI run-off cover, and the cost for the required seven years run-off, if they can get it, in our experience is generally around the same as five years of typical PI premiums for self-licensed advisers."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 4 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 days 6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS