Retain life insurance commission: FPA
The Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA) has rejected proposals to ban commissions as it could leave consumers chronically underinsured and dependant on social security.
There had been a number of calls for the banning of all remaining conflicts of interests including life insurance commission, in light of the Quality of Advice Review’s proposals on the Life Insurance Framework (LIF).
This had been proposed by consumer advocacy groups such as Choice and Industry Super Australia.
FPA chief executive, Sarah Abood, said: “By banning commissions, we’d effectively be removing consumers’ ability to choose how they wish to pay for their advice.
“Multiple research studies have shown that a high proportion of consumers would not purchase insurance at all if they were required to pay an upfront fee. So the result would be that far fewer Australians would have appropriate insurance protection in place.”
Retail advised new life insurance business volumes were already expected to fall over the next few years as the number of advisers providing advice on life insurance had declined and the remuneration for this had also declined.
She said she welcomed the findings by the Review that showed a significant improvement in quality of life insurance advice provided over the past four years and said this was being disregarded by those who sought a commission ban.
“This improvement has not been acknowledged by consumer groups. These groups have taken a position that it is impossible to deliver a quality service to consumers where any conflict exists, but the data shows this is not the case.”
The FPA had previously stated it would like to see the two ASIC life insurance advice file reviews and a life insurance data collection used for the review to be further assessed to properly determine the outcome.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
Still haven't seen one premium go down since they saved so much money on commissions... Royal Commission into the insurance industry and the LIF review I think.
Best not say that out loud - the Consumer Groups and the Bureaucrats in ASIC/Treasury probably haven't yet been told this (they would need to spend Millions of $$$$ doing a study to find this out) and if they knew, would likely just blame it on Putin. Lets face it facts, it is very unlikely Commissions were reduced to help consumers - I reckon they just want Financial Planners out of way so Product Manufactures can control delivery via Industry Super - but I could be wrong?