Pershing pleads guilty to mishandling client money


Pershing Securities Australia (PSAL) has pleaded guilty to mishandling client monies and in turn is the first company in Australia to face criminal prosecution for breaching client money provisions.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said in an announcement that the provisions were designed to protect the interests of Australian financial services licensee clients by ensuring that client money was kept separate from licensee money.
PSAL pleaded guilty at the Downing Centre Local Court in Sydney to:
- Breaching s993B(1) between 25 January, 2016, and 31 December, 2018, by receiving money in connection with financial services, and then failing to pay that money into an account that satisfied the client money requirements within s981B of the Corporations Act 2001; and
- Breaching s993C(1) between 30 June, 2016, and 16 December, 2017, through making payments out of a client money account that were not permitted by reg 7.8.02 of the Corporations Regulations.
ASIC said each offence carried a maximum penalty of 250 penalty units (approximately $45,000).
PSAL also admitted guilt to a third s993B(1) breach that took place on 21 August, 2017.
ASIC noted that as part of the plea, PSAL would not be sentenced on this breach but it would be taken into account during sentencing for the other charges.
The matter has been listed for sentence on 27 July, 2020.
Recommended for you
AZ NGA’s CEO has unpacked how its recent $345 million debt facility from Barings will accelerate its advice network’s growth ambitions, and allow its largest firms to access a greater source of funding.
Research by Colonial First State has found women are reluctant to make retirement preparations, despite 62 per cent saying they feel that they are unable to achieve a comfortable retirement.
Managed accounts saw net inflows of $14.3 billion in the six months to 31 December, according to the latest IMAP FUM census.
The increased bids for Insignia from Bain and CC Capital value the company at $3.3 billion, while there is still a possibility for competing bids from rival players such as Brookfield.