New rules for debt-based investments urgently required

property disclosure financial services reform financial services licence financial services industry australian financial services australian securities and investments commission risk management

4 September 2007
| By Justin Knight |

The corporate regulator’s proposal to improve disclosure rules for debt-based investment vehicles will go some way to improving transparency and security for investors but will not, in themselves, prevent the next Fincorp or Westpoint-style catastrophe from occurring, according to the InstituteofActuariesof Australia (IAA).

At a media briefing yesterday, IAA highlighted what it considers “fundamental flaws” in the current business model, including a disconcerting lack of transparency and regulation. At present, issuers of debt-based investment products (such as debentures and unsecured notes) are not regulated under the Financial Services Reform Act as offering debt is not classified as a financial service.

IAA sent the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) a letter on July 30 stating as much and outlining suggested improvements.

ASIC’s discussion paper detailing proposed improvements to disclosure practices in the $8 billion debenture market was released about a month later.

However, IAA believes issuers of debt-based investment vehicles should also be required to hold an Australian Financial Services licence and submit their products for independent assessment.

IAA cautioned that if things are allowed to continue as they are, property-related investment scheme collapses such as Fincorp and Westpoint could spread to other debt-based investment vehicles.

“There are a lot of other products on the market that are running around now that are leveraged products by their nature — warrants, CDOs, all the rest of it,” IAA senior vice-president Greg Martin said.

“We don’t see these debenture schemes as being the last cowboy in the west.”

IAA’s suggested improvements to the current business model also include requiring issuers of debentures to satisfy “fit and proper” character requirements, submit their products for an independent financial soundness assessment, label them more accurately and clearly and disclose potential conflicts of interest (such as a relationship with a property developer).

“Complex and detailed disclosure has not been effective at protecting consumers or explaining risks under direct to public offers,” Martin said.

“Which is why we [IAA] think a succinct and prominent risk warning aligned with the product label should be considered.”

IAA contended that actuaries’ expertise in financial risk management in other sectors of the financial services industry could be extended to debt-based investment vehicles.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 1 day ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 8 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 23 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

1 day 3 hours ago