IFSA supports call for review of short selling
The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has responded to an Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) consultation paper, about short selling and stock lending, with a submission supporting the review.
IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert said, in reference to the consultation paper, that short selling is a long established investment activity and an integral part of global capital markets.
He said it contributes to market liquidity and assists to ensure market price efficiency for both the underlying securities and a variety of derivative contracts that are used for risk management and hedging.
“Active investors borrow to short sell securities they believe are overvalued and take long positions in securities they believe are undervalued. Active investment management also plays an important role in effective price discovery.
“Our submission identifies several measures that we believe will improve disclosure and transparency, if adopted,” he said.
IFSA said in a statement that it supports the disclosure of all short sale positions directly to the market supervisor, the ASX, on a disaggregated and timely basis in order to promote market integrity and assist surveillance of the market.
“However, on the matter of ‘vote renting’, whereby an investor borrows shares in order to vote on a transaction to secure a desired outcome, IFSA is firmly opposed.
“To this end, IFSA is in the process of preparing an industry circular reaffirming IFSA’s position which also includes a series of best practice recommendations to minimize the risks of vote renting for our members,” Gilbert said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
