Govt proposes changes to regulation

remuneration/disclosure/government/SOA/financial-planning-association/chief-executive/

17 November 2006
| By Sara Rich |
image
image image
expand image

Chris Pearce

In the scope of the Government’s proposed changes to financial services regulation is the compliance burden surrounding Statements of Advice (SOA) and personal advice, an issue that Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer Chris Pearce hopes will be significantly reduced.

Under the suggested amendment, an SOA will not be required when personal advice is provided that does not involve the recommendation of a product and no remuneration is received.

Instead, a Record of Advice would be required to be prepared by the adviser.

A threshold for requiring an SOA has also been proposed in an effort to address the issue of smaller scale investors having limited access to affordable financial advice.

If this reform is approved, a full SOA would only be required if the advice is given in relation to an investment amount above $10,000, except in relation to superannuation.

Again, a Record of Advice would need to be kept in these circumstances.

Other areas of financial services regulation that are covered in the proposed changes include the definition of wholesale investors, PS 146 training requirements, non-cash payment facilities and the product disclosure of pooled superannuation trusts.

Announcing the proposal package last week, Pearce said the changes, which also encompass corporate regulation, were designed to create a less complex regulatory environment.

“This is a red letter day for the corporate and financial services industries,” he said. “The reforms signal clearly the Government’s continuing commitment to reducing the regulatory burden.”

Financial Planning Association chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch welcomed most of the proposals, but also expressed disappointment that superannuation had been excluded from the $10,000 threshold proposal.

Bloch shares the concern of many that the consolidation of a number of small accounts from different superannuation funds has the potential to attract high fees.

“The Government is aware of our concerns, and has stated that this is a journey, taking one step at a time,” she said.

“The consultation process means that we have an opportunity to state our case and convince the Government why Australians need advice on superannuation, as well as other financial matters, and that those with small superannuation account balances should not be excluded.”

The Government is calling for industry feedback and public comment on the proposed refinements to be received by December 22, 2006.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 23 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo