FPA member confusion over remuneration paper
Elements of the Financial Planning Association’s Financial Planner Remuneration Consultation Paper are causing significant confusion among its members.
Chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said the FPA was concerned that a number of members were confused about some elements of the remuneration paper.
“It’s now two weeks into the consultation period and it is timely to provide clarification on some of the misunderstandings and concerns that have arisen.
Bloch added that a number of financial planners have raised wide-ranging concerns over the different types of charging structures and definitions in the paper.
For one thing, she said, the FPA is “not recommending hourly rate fees as the only alternative to commission-based remuneration".
“Asset-based fees and service-based fees agreed by and paid for by the client are also included as a client-directed payment mechanism, which means the FPA’s proposal is not restricted to hourly or time-cost fees only."
Since releasing the paper, there has also been much debate about what constitutes a commission, she said.
“A commission is a payment made by the product provider to the financial planner through their licensee for recommending a product.
“The FPA is recommending a transition away from this to ensure transparency within the financial planning profession and consumer protection.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025 with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
