FPA member confusion over remuneration paper
Elements of the Financial Planning Association’s Financial Planner Remuneration Consultation Paper are causing significant confusion among its members.
Chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said the FPA was concerned that a number of members were confused about some elements of the remuneration paper.
“It’s now two weeks into the consultation period and it is timely to provide clarification on some of the misunderstandings and concerns that have arisen.
Bloch added that a number of financial planners have raised wide-ranging concerns over the different types of charging structures and definitions in the paper.
For one thing, she said, the FPA is “not recommending hourly rate fees as the only alternative to commission-based remuneration".
“Asset-based fees and service-based fees agreed by and paid for by the client are also included as a client-directed payment mechanism, which means the FPA’s proposal is not restricted to hourly or time-cost fees only."
Since releasing the paper, there has also been much debate about what constitutes a commission, she said.
“A commission is a payment made by the product provider to the financial planner through their licensee for recommending a product.
“The FPA is recommending a transition away from this to ensure transparency within the financial planning profession and consumer protection.”
Recommended for you
New York-based firm CC Capital has bumped up its offer to stay ahead of rival bidder Bain Capital.
In a tight race against Morgans, AMP Financial Planning has won back its position as the largest individual licensee in Australia, according to Wealth Data.
Learning to delegate authority and relinquish a hands-on approach is a critical step towards building a self-sustaining financial advice practice, says Assured Support.
Private wealth management company Stellan Capital has appointed a new chief executive, who brings over three decades of experience in the global financial services industry.
