FPA helps members adopt conflicts principles
In an effort to ensure a smooth implementation of the Principles to Manage Conflicts of Interest, the Financial Planning Association (FPA) has issued a set of guidelines to its members, which includes background, details of the principles and some worked examples.
The guide will act as just the beginning of a more proactive effort by the FPA to help its members adhere to the stated recommendations.
“We’ll talk about these principles at every opportunity we get. We’ll run CPD [continuing professional development]-type workshops, and that’s already underway, [we’re] putting together training sessions, working with principals on the interpretation and so forth,” FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.
“We need to be really active and out there in the offices helping people understand what they need to deal with, whether it’s detail or high level or scenarios,” she added.
The FPA has also used the guidelines to clarify the purpose of the principles themselves.
“There’s been a lot debate about the obligation to provide appropriate advice and where that stands in relation to the planner’s duty to the client. This makes it clear that the client’s interest is to come first. Where there’s a conflict of interest, the planner is to put the client’s interest first,” FPA policy manager John Anning said.
FPA chair Corinna Dieters believes Principle One, which deals with the cost of advice, will have the biggest impact on the planning profession.
“We’re squarely positioning the value of the advice that’s delivered by a financial planner in the mind of the client, and that relationship between the client and the adviser is now being seen as the critical element,” she said.
“So I think that’s where we’ll see a shift towards a much clearer arrangement from a remuneration practice point of view,” Dieters added.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
