FPA Conflict Principles
1. A financial planner will provide a client with clear, concise, and comprehensive information so that the client will understand the advice and service being offered and its cost.
2. Financial planning advice should be in an independent from, and not tied to product recommendations.
3. Where it is appropriate to recommend a product to a client, all FPA members should only offer products that suit the needs of the client, and do not bring the industry into disrepute.
4. No FPA member shall receive or reward any remuneration or benefits that are biased against, or may not be in the interests of the client.
5. A financial planner must disclose to a client any existing or potential financial interests (such as shareholdings or equity entitlements) they, or an entity in which they have an interest in, have in the products or platforms they use and/or in their Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensee or related entity.
6. There should be separate corporate governance in place between an AFS licensee and related fund managers, and product/platform manufacturers within the same group.
7. FPA members have a responsibility to abide by the FPA principles to address any real or perceived conflicts of interest.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
