Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA and IFSA warn industry funds on planning

industry-funds/financial-services-association/financial-advice-industry/commissions/remuneration/disclosure/financial-services-reform/financial-planning-association/financial-planners/executive-director/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/chief-executive/

28 March 2007
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

Australia is confronted by a shortage of financial planners capable of leading to spiralling levels of remuneration, according to the executive director of the Investment and Financial Services Association, Richard Gilbert.

Gilbert used an address to this week’s Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) on the Gold Coast to warn there was “a surging demand for advice which is outpacing supply”.

What is more, he said the workings of the Financial Services Reform Act had not been sympathetic to scaled advice or more efficient methods of delivery, meaning the industry at large and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission needed to collaborate to come up with solutions capable of boosting both adviser numbers and throughput.

The chief executive of the Financial Planning Association, Jo-Anne Bloch, also addressed CMSF and called for a united approach between planners and industry funds to the delivery of quality advice to consumers.

Speaking just days after Industry Funds spokesman Garry Weaven had used the conference to reinforce his calls for legislation imposing an obligation on planners to provide advice in the best interests of clients, Bloch said it was time to recognise how heavily regulated the financial advice industry was.

“Recognising that the advice industry is heavily regulated, shouldn’t we embrace the fact that there are different ways to deliver advice,” she said.

“As long as there is tough regulation and as long as there is full disclosure and transparency, consumers should be able to choose whether they need advice, whether they want advice relating to a product only, or whether they want more complex advice, which might include a whole lot more than super.”

Bloch said that a heavily regulated model should be capable of overcoming arguments about fees and commissions and that the real debate should now be about the delivery of advice across the industry to those who need it and want it.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND