FOS wary of banking tribunal
The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has looked to protect its own role as it cautioned the Federal Government against making hasty decisions on a banking tribunal before comprehensively reviewing the external dispute resolution.
As FOS mulled over the possibility of the emergence of another dispute resolution forum, it issued a statement urging for the Government to allow the independent expert panel it appointed to review external dispute resolution and complaints schemes in the financial sector before deciding on the banking tribunal.
It emphasised the need to give this time, stating the terms of reference for the review was released only two weeks ago by Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O'Dwyer.
Two Federal Government MPs from New South Wales and Queensland have proposed the banking tribunal and approached senior members of the Liberal party about the proposal as an avenue for consumers who cannot afford to go to courts for banking disputes.
Federal Treasurer, Scott Morrison, indicated he was open to the idea as a way to thwart a Royal Commission into the banking sector, which is being heavily pushed by Federal Opposition Leader, Bill Shorten, and Labor.
However, FOS believes the proposal for a banking tribunal also falls within the scope of the current government review of dispute resolution and complaint schemes.
"The independent experts appointed by the government to conduct this review are best placed to consider all aspects, from all angles, of dispute arrangements for the financial sector," the ombudsman said.
"Importantly, we want to see less rather than more complexity for consumers in resolving financial disputes. We also want to avoid changes that could lead to a more costly, adversarial and legalistic approach to dispute resolution for consumers and small businesses."
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
