Financial services salaries - not how much but why
Australia's financial services prudential regulator is not interested in how much the nation's top financial services executives are being paid but how and why they're receiving such large amounts.
That is the analysis of Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) general manager, David Lewis, who has told a forum that the regulator is "not interested in remuneration in and of itself".
"What we are concerned about is risk management," he said.
"So, when we see remuneration policies that encourage risky behaviour - yes - we get very interested."
Lewis said that despite all the public angst about the size of bank executive pay packets, "we're ambivalent about that".
"What APRA looks at is not the 'how much' of executive pay, but the 'why'.
"Our concern is to make sure that the remuneration practices adopted by regulated financial institutions are sound and do not imbed 'risk time bombs' in the balance sheet which could undermine the future viability of the firm," he said.
Lewis said that what APRA looked at were the performance hurdles that underpinned these pay structures.
"Are these performance hurdles consistent with the prudent risk management of the firm? Or do the performance indicators used to reward executives promote short-term profits at the expense of the firm's long-term sustainability?
"Is too much emphasis being placed on revenue growth today and insufficient regard being paid to the quality of assets being brought onto the firm's balance sheet?"
Lewis said that overall Australian financial institutions had measured up well to APRA's scrutiny, especially when compared to their overseas counterparts.
However he said that there were some concerns around performance measurements relying too heavily on generic measures such as share price, market share or earnings per share.
"Metrics such as these are too high level to provide a reliable measure of individual performance and risk-taking," Lewis said.
He said better practice was to adopt a balanced scorecard approach incorporating a mix of individual performance metrics and qualitative assessment.
Recommended for you
The top five licensees are demonstrating a “strong recovery” from losses in the first half of the year, and the gap is narrowing between their respective adviser numbers.
With many advisers preparing to retire or sell up, business advisory firm Business Health believes advisers need to take a proactive approach to informing their clients of succession plans.
Retirement commentators have flagged that almost a third of Australians over 50 are unprepared for the longevity of retirement and are falling behind APAC peers in their preparations and advice engagement.
As private markets continue to garner investor interest, Netwealth’s series of private market reports have revealed how much advisers and wealth managers are allocating, as well as a growing attraction to evergreen funds.
