Consistency urged on advice fees in super
One of Australia’s largest superannuation industry organisations, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), has told the second phase of the Cooper Review that financial advice provided in relation to superannuation should not entail commission-based remuneration.
The ASFA submission, which substantially backs calls by the Institute of Actuaries for the separation of fees into four different categories, said there was a need to separate out advice fees because different superannuation funds offered markedly different service levels for advice.
“It is important for members to be able to understand what they are paying for and utilise the services accordingly,” it said.
“For example, if they do not want advice they may prefer to choose a fund that does not offer the service,” the submission said.
ASFA said it believed the level of advice fee should always be shown, including whether it could be turned on or off.
The submission also called for a consistent industry approach with respect to fees, with standard definitions and standard disclosure arrangements.
“There needs to be a consistent and enforced methodology for calculating superannuation fund investment performance, both in terms of the fees and costs deducted,” the submission said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
A former licensee director, who failed to report an adviser’s fee-for-no-service conduct, has been banned for three years by ASIC.
Coastal Advice Group chief executive, Daniel Brown, has said the firm has no intention of slowing down, with plans to do as many as 15 acquisitions in the next 12 months.
The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call.
Two national advice businesses have merged to form a leading holistic advice business with $2.5 billion in funds under management.
