Conflicts of interest: fee separation by Jan 07
Members of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) will be expected to separately disclose the cost of advice from the cost of an investment product to their clients from January 1, 2007 under the Principles for Managing Conflicts of Interest released this morning.
Regular disclosure of ongoing advice fees paid by a client, however, will not be required until January 1, 2008.
The requirement for all members to ensure that their advice properly suits the needs of their client must be adopted by July 1, 2006.
“In adopting a principles-based approach, the FPA has refined its members’ obligations into four principles against which they can assess their current policy and practice,” said FPA chair Corinna Dieters.
“Implementation timeframes of the principles allow members sufficient time to put appropriate structure and work place practices in place.”
Dieters said the principles would be mandatory, but any complaints against members would be investigated on a case by case basis.
Concerns about non-compliance brought to the FPA’s attention by members, corporate regulators and consumers will be considered by the association’s Professional Standards and Ethics Committee, she said.
But for the principle considered to be the most important - the requirement to separate the cost of advice from the cost of the investment product - the FPA has said this will not be necessary in all circumstances.
“The implementation guidelines for the principles states that where fees or payments cannot be separately identified or cannot be varied or terminated by the client in agreement with their adviser, they must be disclosed as commission. The FPA believes that the regular disclosure of any ongoing commission is best practice,” Dieters said.
The completed principles are as follows:
1. The cost of financial planning advice should be separately identified as a financial planning advice fee in the Statements of Advice provided by FPA members to clients, and the total fees paid for ongoing advice should be disclosed to clients on a regular basis.
2. Where it is appropriate to recommend a product to a client, all FPA members will undertake the due diligence necessary to offer products which suit the needs of the client and do not bring the industry into disrepute.
3. No remuneration or benefits paid by a FPA Principal Member to one of their financial planners should be biased against or not in the interests of the client.
4. Separate corporate governance arrangements should govern FPA Principal members and all or any related financial services provider and/or entity.
Principles three and four become effective from January 1, 2007.
Recommended for you
With an advice M&A deal taking around six months to enact, two experts have shared their tips on how buyers and sellers can avoid “deal fatigue” and prevent potential deals from collapsing.
Several financial advisers have been shortlisted in the ninth annual Women in Finance Awards 2025, to be held on 14 November.
Digital advice tools are on the rise, but licensees will need to ensure they still meet adviser obligations or potentially risk a class action if clients lose money from a rogue algorithm.
Shaw and Partners has merged with Sydney wealth manager Kennedy Partners Wealth, while Ord Minnett has hired a private wealth adviser from Morgan Stanley.
