Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Codes to achieve same outcomes as opt-in

financial-advisers/ASIC/AFA/association-of-financial-advisers/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/risk-management/

26 July 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Professional codes of conduct that meet approval in terms of obviating the need for financial advisers to comply with opt-in will need to achieve the same outcomes as opt-in, the regulator has confirmed. 

"Codes can't be devised overnight or entered into lightly, either by industry associations or individual code members. Our code approval processes will be careful and rigorous," Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) senior manager Nick Coates said at the Association of Financial Advisers roadshow yesterday.

ASIC expected codes would take months rather than weeks to develop, and applicants would need to submit information about how the code was devised, how it will be enforced, and any other matters outlined in the guidance, he said.

ASIC would soon be releasing guidance on the code approval process and would be consulting on the matter, and in the meantime he encouraged stakeholders to look at the existing regulatory guidance (RG 183) relating to professional code approval.

"As for obviating the need, I'm sure it will not come as a surprise to hear that at this stage our view is that obviating the need via opt-in does not mean that advisers will suddenly have no responsibilities in this area," Coates said.

"We expect codes to contain provisions that will achieve substantially the same outcomes as the opt-in requirements intend to achieve. That is: engage retail clients who receive valued services for the ongoing fees that they pay," he said.

Coates also flagged a "bad apples" project that would target the practice of less reputable advisers jumping from licensee to licensee and benefitting from a lack of reference checking within the industry.

ASIC would also be starting the second phase of its business surveillance project on second tier licensees. He said ASIC would expect different results and different types of risk management frameworks due to the different size of licensees in the sample. Coates also said the survey would be less rigorous and take less time to complete than the original survey.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND