AIOFP seeks partners to lower fees

fee-for-service platforms remuneration australian financial services IOOF chief executive money management

17 September 2009
| By Liam Egan |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Independently-Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP) has put out tenders to eight platform providers to provide four white label platforms in an effort to ultimately lower the cost of fee-for-service to its members’ client base.

The tenders are to provide white label platforms to Personal Choice Management (PCM), which has been operating since 2001 as a private and white label administration service for AIOFP members.

PCM currently has a white label joint venture with Asgard, which contains $600 million in AIOFP client funds under administration (FUA), and previously had one with IOOF until it was sold back to IOOF a few years ago.

The tenders follow a vote of the AIOFP membership last month, in which 75 per cent of members, representing 120 practices and 1,800 advisers, voted in favour of expanding PCM’s number of joint ventures.

At the same time these members pledged to support the new white labels with their current total of $20 billion in client FUA, including $6 billion from Australian Financial Services and $5 billion from Wealthsure.

Projected annual inflows to the new white labels are estimated at $3 billion dollars, requiring these members to switch from their current providers, according to AIOFP chief executive Peter Johnston.

Terms are currently being negotiated with existing PCM provider Asgard to reflect the anticipated volumes increase expected from the tenders, Johnston said.

The PCM board has been expanded in the interim to accommodate the new white labels, and now includes Wealthsure head Darren Pawski and AFS head Peter Daly, as well as Johnston himself.

Pawski told Money Management the initiative was “about protecting our businesses in the light of the potential new legislative changes to remuneration going forward”.

“If we are able to reach effectively a position where we’re in control of the platforms from the point of view of providing us with a management service, we will be able to get down the costs of fee-for-service for our clients.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 5 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

5 days 3 hours ago

A relevant provider has received a written direction from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after a superannuation rollover resulted in tax bill of over $200,000 fo...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS