AFCA examines possibilities for fairer funding model
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is examining how it can reduce cross-subsidisation when it comes to levy funding and treat smaller firms more fairly.
Speaking at the AFCA member forum, chief executive, David Locke, said AFCA was awaiting the results of a Treasury independent review into the body which was expected “any day now”.
Regarding what the review might advise on fees and funding, Locke said AFCA was already exploring how it could reduce cross-subsidisation in particular.
“This is something we have been considering and we are awaiting any recommendation from the independent review,” Locke said.
“Our starting point was to establish principles and one of us was around cross-subsidisation. You don’t want to have insurers cross-subsidising the work they handle with banks or financial advisers being granted fees related to other areas.”
Another area was how funding could work for small firms or those which received few complaints.
“We are also looking at how we can keep fees low, particularly for matters that involve a small amount of funds and where they are being resolved very early on, in the registration stage,” Locke said.
“We’re looking at how we can work with smaller members or members who have very few complaints.
“Clearly, when you make any changes to a funding model, it will mean you have some people who pay less and some who pay more so we will have to look at how fair that is. We are very conscious of that and want to have a sustainable funding model as we are very aware AFCA is funded by its members and we want it to be fair.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
