AFCA examines possibilities for fairer funding model
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is examining how it can reduce cross-subsidisation when it comes to levy funding and treat smaller firms more fairly.
Speaking at the AFCA member forum, chief executive, David Locke, said AFCA was awaiting the results of a Treasury independent review into the body which was expected “any day now”.
Regarding what the review might advise on fees and funding, Locke said AFCA was already exploring how it could reduce cross-subsidisation in particular.
“This is something we have been considering and we are awaiting any recommendation from the independent review,” Locke said.
“Our starting point was to establish principles and one of us was around cross-subsidisation. You don’t want to have insurers cross-subsidising the work they handle with banks or financial advisers being granted fees related to other areas.”
Another area was how funding could work for small firms or those which received few complaints.
“We are also looking at how we can keep fees low, particularly for matters that involve a small amount of funds and where they are being resolved very early on, in the registration stage,” Locke said.
“We’re looking at how we can work with smaller members or members who have very few complaints.
“Clearly, when you make any changes to a funding model, it will mean you have some people who pay less and some who pay more so we will have to look at how fair that is. We are very conscious of that and want to have a sustainable funding model as we are very aware AFCA is funded by its members and we want it to be fair.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
