AFA cries out for certainty on how AFCA judges complaints

AFCA AFA quality of advice review

20 June 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The financial advice profession needs more certainty on how the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) will judge a complaint, says the Association of Financial Planners (AFA).

In its submission to the Quality of Advice Review Issues Paper released earlier this week, the AFA said many advisers were particularly concerned with by the standards that were set through the decisions made by AFCA.

“It is one thing to have regulatory certainty in terms of what the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) expects to comply with the Best Interests Duty and related obligations, however if advice assessed by ASIC as compliant was assessed as non-compliant by AFCA, then this fails to pass the test,” the association said.

The AFA argued there needed to be a high level of consistency between what licensees thought was compliant and what ASIC and AFCA thought was compliant.

“We believe that this could be addressed by AFCA producing more guidance and through the establishment of forums to discuss their interpretation of cases,” it said.

Further key recommendations included:

  • The regulatory obligations for the provision of financial advice should be proportionate to the level of complexity and risk of client detriment;
  • Achievement of regulatory certainty to better enable the provision of limited scope advice, including in terms of the requirements for the fact find process;
  • Increased regulatory certainty on the obligations with respect to demonstration of compliance with the Best Interest Duty;
  • Removal of the Best Interests Duty safe harbour and ability to demonstrate professional judgement or repeal of the “other steps” obligation and the ASIC record keeping class order;
  • Fix existing issues with FDS compliance or removal of the requirement to report the previous year fees, which are already reported in product statements;
  • Greater flexibility in the use of Records of Advice, including increasing the threshold for small investments and expanding it to include small life insurance cases;
  • Enable greater access to client data through the Consumer Data Right, ATO Portal, my.gov.au and Centrelink;
  • Retention of upfront life insurance commissions, but increased to 80% and a reduction in the year two clawback rate; and
  • Support for small businesses to appoint Professional Year candidates and relaxation of some of the PY program obligations.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 6 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 10 hours ago