Advisers’ priority is on obtaining consent: AFA
Advisers cannot shy away from conflict in a client relationship if it is needed to secure consent for the advice, according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).
At the AFA roadshow in Sydney, a panel was given a scenario where a client with a language barrier nodded to a decision rather than verbally consented and the conversation was handled by her English-speaking husband.
Standard 4 of the FASEA Code of Ethics stated that an adviser “may only act for a client with their free, prior and informed consent” while Standard 2 stated an adviser “must act with integrity and in the best interests of each of their clients”.
Phil Anderson, AFA chief executive, said: “A client needs to give consent, a nod is not consent especially if there is a language barrier. If one client is dominating and the other is subservient to them then you have to find a way to have genuine agreement and that might mean there is conflict.
“You can’t be too aggressive but have to be careful and put the priority on making sure you have genuine consent from the client, not prioritising the avoidance of conflict.
“If you can’t get that then to have to ask if you can continue to advise them if you aren’t acting in their best interest.”
Fellow panellist Matthew Gale, financial adviser at GJ Private Wealth, said that could mean bringing in an interpreter for ease of communication in order to ensure the client understood.
David Glen, national technical manager at TAL, added a scenario like that would make him wonder if one party had something to hide or was controlling the assets.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
