Academic calls for heads to roll at FASEA

FASEA Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority education professionalisation disclosure ethics code of ethics matthew rowe Mark Brimble Adrian Raftery deakin university

24 June 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

Financial planning academic and, according to some in the industry, “whistle-blower”, Adrian Raftery, has called for the resignation of four Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) directors, including its former acting managing director, Mark Brimble, as well as the release of 12 months of documents and submissions relating to the Authority’s decisions.

The director of professional and executive education (domestic) at Deakin Business School alleged that FASEA’s chair, Catherine Walker, directors, Matthew Rowe and Simon Longstaff, and Brimble, all of whom had been on the Authority’s board since its inception, each had inadequately managed conflicts of interest.

He called for the release of all public submissions to the Authority and the agendas and minutes of all contributors meetings over the last year, regardless of whether suppression orders were in place. Posting on LinkedIn from Europe, he wrote “I bet they won’t” make the release, implying that not doing so would put the FASEA’s directors in breach of the Authority’s own Code of Ethics.

“I would encourage the FASEA directors to look at their very own Code of Ethics and their inner ethical self to determine their own course of action,” he wrote, referring to standards three and 12, which respectfully ban conflicts of interest and require the upholding and promoting of the profession’s ethical standards and accountability in the protection of the public interest.

“As the nation’s leading Ethical Authority it is absolutely imperative that FASEA acts with integrity and transparency, devoid of any conflicts of interest,” Raftery believed, saying that the document release was aimed at this end.

The academic, who recently announced he was leaving Deakin University, also asked the planning industry for its support in making what he described as a “brave move”, noting that he had been called a whistle-blower for his action.

“Today I got called a whistle-blower for the first time ... sometimes you have to make a stand for what you believe is right.  Especially in such a conflicted environment,” he wrote in another LinkedIn post.

“It will become news very shortly ... I just hope others in the financial planning industry have the guts to support me. It's time to stand up for what is right because it is horrible seeing what is happening before advisers' eyes!”

At the time of writing, over a dozen advisers had offered him their support over the professional networking site.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

6 days 23 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS