Financial planning commissions going the way of the dodo

financial planning industry government commissions remuneration storm financial financial services reform super funds financial planners

10 May 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The move towards a commission-free financial planning industry is inevitable, writes Mike Taylor.

It says much about the reputational damage inflicted on the Australian financial planning industry over the past five years that virtually no one, apart from planners themselves, found cause to question the legislative changes to planning outlined last week by the Minister for Financial Services, Chris Bowen.

Ordinary consumers reading newspapers or watching television could have been forgiven for believing the Government had acted to end an outrageous rort perpetrated by a group of unscrupulous rogues.

There were plenty of mentions of Storm Financial and Westpoint, but few references to the manner in which the industry had already addressed its own shortcomings.

But the bottom line is this: the sheer weight of public opinion makes change inevitable and retaining commission-based remuneration untenable.

Once that reality is broadly accepted the financial planning industry can unify to ensure the other elements of the Government’s proposed legislation do not result in serious unintended consequences, such as unduly empowering the big banks and creating a risky two-tier advice environment.

Commissions only ever represented one element of conflict in the planner/client relationship and always needed to be measured against the commercial imperatives that drive planners who work within financial institutions, including banks and super funds.

And the Government is wrong if it believes it can legislate significant changes to the delivery of financial planning while simply expanding the provision of intra-fund advice under the existing relief offered by the regulator.

The perpetuation of a two-tiered legislative environment is unwise, highly dangerous and points to a Government willing to favour sectional interests.

Super funds providing financial advice must be made to adhere to the same standards as financial planners.

If the Government was made uncomfortable by the fallout from the home insulation debacle, it should contemplate the damage likely to result from bad advice given within super.

When the Howard Government introduced Financial Services Reform many loose ends needed to be tidied up. Bowen must ensure that his proposed changes do not create more problems than they solve.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 days 4 hours ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 days 4 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months 1 week ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 weeks 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 6 days ago

The corporate regulator has named its new chief executive, who is set to replace retiring interim CEO Greg Yanco in March....

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS