Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Whiteley hits out at banks supporting MySuper regime

mysuper/industry-super-australia/super-funds/industry-super-funds/chief-executive/

16 October 2014
| By Priya |
image
image image
expand image

Banks' claims that the MySuper regime will adequately protect consumers "is absurd", Industry Super Australia (ISA) chief executive, David Whiteley believes.

Addressing the National Press Club, Whiteley, dismissed the banks' claims.

"The banks argue that the MySuper regime offers sufficient protection for consumers," he said. "This is absurd."

Instead Whiteley argued investment in long-term assets such as infrastructure and keeping the super safety net intact is the way forward.

Amidst praising the super system Whiteley expressed the need to retain the super safety net and suggested banks are the biggest threat to the super system

"The banks are lobbying to remove the safety net. They want to leverage their business banking relationships with employers to cross-sell employee default super arrangements, irrespective of the investment returns.

"This model will deliver less, not more, competition and is designed to suit the vertically integrated business model of the four major banks. The safety net has worked in that the predominant default funds have been the better performing funds. These have tended to be funds that have undivided loyalty to their members, such as industry super funds."

The ISA's proposals to extend the default super safety net are:

  • Prohibit banks or related entities from providing default super fund services to employees where the bank is the main banking provider to the employer;
  • Retail and bank owned super funds should earn their profits derived from default super. This can be achieved by permitting these funds to pay dividends to shareholders only when they have delivered median returns to members.

Adding that bank owned super funds should not be part of the default super safety net, but that "profits to shareholders should not be directly traded off at the expense of members who have been defaulted into the fund, ensuring competition in the super industry is focused on long term net returns".

Whiteley concluded emoving the default super safety net would "represent a significant gamble" as it is yet to be tested long term.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND