Superannuation guarantee increase flawed by tax link

government superannuation guarantee taxation superannuation funds federal government trustee chief executive money management

3 November 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government should not have linked increasing the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent to the imposition of the Mineral Resources Rent Tax.

That is the bottom line of a roundtable held yesterday by Money Management's sister publication Super Review, with key participants saying that "superannuation should be treated as superannuation and nothing else".

NGS Super trustee John Quessy said that linking the superannuation guarantee increase to a tax carried with it the risk that another Government would remove that tax and therefore the increase to the SG.

"To make retirement savings dependent on some tax that is popular with the Government at the moment but might not be popular with some other Government in the future means it could subsequently be reversed," he said.

"That could kill the tax and therefore the superannuation," Quessy said. "And if you're serious about superannuation, you treat it as superannuation."

Pillar Administration chief executive Peter Beck said he agreed with Quessy's assessment but said he also understood the Government's need to find a way of funding the rise in the superannuation.

"The Government's problem has been finding ways of funding this, but as an industry we should not express an opinion on where they get the funding from. We should push very hard for the SG contribution being increased and they should find the funding," he said.

Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia general manager of policy David Graus said his organisation agreed there should be no link between a tax and the superannuation guarantee.

"We totally agree it shouldn't be linked, there is enough justification (to increase the SG) on its own," he said.

"ASFA's research shows that it should go ahead on a standalone basis," Graus said.

Deloitte partner Russell Mason said the industry needed to be mindful that 12 per cent would not be enough to fund retirement and relieve pressure on the superannuation guarantee, and that further increases would be required in the future.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 2 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 days 8 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

2 days 12 hours ago