Super returns overlook retirees’ GFC losses

superannuation-funds/stronger-super/super-funds/global-financial-crisis/

29 July 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Some retirees are unlikely to recover any funds lost during the global financial crisis (GFC) - an issue often overlooked in the presentation of superannuation performance statistics, according to Challenger Chairman of Retirement Income Jeremy Cooper. 

Cooper said news of strong investment returns in superannuation funds in 2013 is good news for those still in the accumulation phase, but will have a lesser impact on more than a million retirees who were drawing down on their accumulated superannuation and also lost money during the GFC. 

Cooper said the mathematics behind how superannuation has built up during the past few years works differently for people living off their super. 

“A four-year average of 8.8 per cent per annum after the GFC is great if your money has been locked away, but it’s just not enough if you’ve been using your super for its intended purpose of providing income in retirement,” Cooper said.  

“Because they’ve been drawing income each year, retirees are earning this sort of return on a lower capital base after being hit by the GFC. They are highly unlikely to ever recover their GFC capital losses.” 

Coopers comments are a response to investment return figures released by Chant West last week, which stated that strong markets resulted in a median growth fund return 15.6 per cent over the past year and a four-year average of 8.8 per cent per annum. 

Cooper stated that using headline investment returns to demonstrate the general performance of superannuation overlooks the reality of people within the superannuation system drawing on their savings in retirement.  

He added that about 1.1 million Australians draw retirement income from account-based pensions which are super funds switched into drawdown mode, and that during earlier downturns super funds members were able to benefit from dollar cost averaging.  

However, Cooper said retirees in account-based pensions in the draw-down phase were hit with eroding capital plus the impact of the drawdowns they needed to live on. 

“I’m not advocating that investors try to time the market, but given the poor sequence of returns faced by retirees living on their super during the GFC, they may have been better off if they’d switched to defensive or conservative investment options beforehand to avoid the double whammy,” Cooper said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS