Super opt out plan a 'tax grab': ISA

ISA Matthew Linden superannuation superannuation guarantee SG

14 January 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The proposed Government plan to allow Australians to “opt out” of compulsory super by making the superannuation guarantee (SG) increase to 12% optional will be a “tax grab” on the average Australian family, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).

The ISA said it would be a $20,000 tax grab on the average Australian family that could also leave them with up to $200,000 less super by the time they retire. 

“Reneging on the legislated super guarantee increases would rip billions out of the pockets of workers to be funnelled into government coffers via higher taxes,” it said.

“Wages are taxed at a higher rate than super contributions leaving little for workers once the tax office takes its cut.

“ISA analysis shows that up to two-thirds of an increase could be lost in higher taxes and reductions in other government support payments.”

It said figures from the Government’s own Retirement Income Review showed such a plan would leave all income groups worse off - with lower lifetime disposable incomes.

“It would also be an administrative nightmare to manage an opt-out system – wrapping small business in yet another layer of red tape,” it said.

“This underhanded plan to make super optional would force workers to pay themselves a wage increase by sacrificing their retirement savings – leaving the average 30-year-old couple up to $200,000 less at retirement.

“Any Budget boost would be short-lived, as the super savings grab would lead to a far higher pension bill for future generations.  

“The government MPs advocating for this proposal, who all gleefully pocket more than 15% super, are determined to make Australians sacrifice their retirement savings for the government’s Budget – all while they give up nothing.”

Matthew Linden, ISA deputy chief executive, said making the SG “optional” was a recipe for higher taxes, lower lifetime incomes, and a red tape nightmare for business.

“The Government should follow through on the legislated increase to 12% and not be exploring underhanded ways to renege on it,” Linden said.

“This isn’t choice – it’s a sneaky tax grab that will leave people worse off and rip up one of the system’s founding principles.”   

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS