Super issues too hot to handle for Govt

retirement/SMSFs/government-and-regulation/capital-gains-tax/capital-gains/federal-government/

30 October 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The use of negative gearing and capital gains tax benefits inside of superannuation were too problematic for any government to address, according to Challenger chair of retirement income Jeremy Cooper.

Speaking at a panel session at the Citi Investment Conference chaired by Citi Transactional Services senior adviser Nick Sherry, Cooper said the previous Federal Government had formed a cross-industry working group to tackle policy issues within the area of superannuation and retirement income.

"We looked at whether policy around superannuation could be governed by an independent body and filter all policy proposals for super through considerations around taxation and access to super and so on," he said.

"These kind of issues — changing franking credits, changing the CGT exemption on the family home and negative gearing — are probably too toxic for any government to seriously look at," Cooper said.

"I am not saying they are not important issues, but if we had a body that was independent of politics it could highlight the options and look at addressing these while getting a benefit somewhere else.

"But there are a handful of issues that are so toxic they can't be dealt with, and a working group is only place to have a thrash around and look at them."

Despite these issues, Cooper said that superannuation fund leakage to the self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) sector was a sign that consumers were aware of what funds were offering and had chosen their own retirement investment vehicle.

"It is a healthy battle and one of the rare occasions in this industry when the customer gets the choice and competition. As a result we have seen large funds emulating the customer experience in the self-managed space," Cooper said.

"We also need to consider what SMSFs are. They are a wrapped vehicle for retirement with a structure for efficient tax outcomes, and it is up to the rest of the industry to compete with that — so it is a healthy shakeout of what the customer wants."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 7 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo