Super industry wants consultation on Govt's Budget changes

Budget superannuation russell mason Deloitte ASFA Martin Fahy mysuper AIST Eva Scheerlinck ISA

7 October 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The superannuation industry has signalled it is not significantly opposed to the Federal Government’s latest Budget superannuation measures but has called for more detail and consultation around how it will ultimately work.

Deloitte superannuation partner, Russell Mason, set the tone for the industry’s reaction to the Your Future, Your Super measures announced in the Budget by stating while stapling members to a particular fund and subjecting funds to an annual objective performance test had merit, the industry needed to see the specifics.

“And I hope there will be significant consultation to ensure that these proposals work as they are intended to,” he said.

Mason’s views were echoed by Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy, who said the devil would be in the detail.

“ASFA supports measures to lift standards for MySuper in order to improve retirement outcomes for superannuants, and how these changes are made needs to be carefully considered,” he said. “We don’t suffer from a shortage of good funds and we need to ensure that these measures don’t reduce competitive intensity or damage the nation building role of superannuation.

“In the absence of the release of the Retirement Income Review and the lack of specificity in the Budget papers, it is unclear how the changes will work in practice or what the implications will be for competition, efficiency and incumbents in the sector.”

Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, also called for greater detail.

“We will need to see the stapling scheme in more detail, but we do have a number of concerns. There is the danger of people being mis-sold or stapled to an underperforming fund outside the default system. It is also a concern that there may be individuals who find themselves uninsurable because they are stapled to a fund whose insurance does not cover their occupation.

 “There is no place for underperformance in defaults but the Government has failed to address the greatest area of consumer harm in super which is outside the default system.”

Industry Super Australia (ISA) also expressed concern about people finding themselves stapled into a dud fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS