Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super funds want different treatment on tax advice

association-of-superannuation-funds/ASFA/government-and-regulation/taxation/compliance/financial-planning/treasury/superannuation-funds/superannuation-industry/financial-advice/trustee/federal-government/superannuation-fund/

15 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government has been asked to clarify whether superannuation funds will have to be registered to provide taxation advice or related financial product advice under amendments to the Tax Agent Services Act currently being developed by Treasury.

In a submission to the Treasury dealing with the proposed legislative amendments, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has pointed out the degree to which superannuation funds are already providing tax-related and financial product advice, and the manner in which the cost is being amortised across fund memberships.

It is arguing that clarity is needed with respect to whether registration is required "where access to financial advice is a benefit of fund membership and is not separately charged for".

The ASFA submission says the new legislative framework operates by requiring entities that provide tax agent services for fee or other rewards to be registered if they are to avoid the potential civil penalties, with tax agent services being defined as including tax advice (financial product) services.

"Within the superannuation industry it is reasonably common for funds to provide financial advice (including subject matter that will be covered by tax advice (financial product) services) to fund members without charge," the submission said.

"Effectively the provision of the advice is a benefit of membership, with the cost of providing the service regarded as a general cost of fund administration. As such, the cost is recovered from

administration fees that are charged to all members, whether or not they avail themselves of the service," it said.

The submission said it was unclear whether, under such an arrangement, a trustee of a superannuation fund would be required to be registered.

It said on this basis ASFA was recommending that clarification be provided in the [legislation's] explanatory memorandum "as to the applicability of registration requirements to situations in the superannuation industry where access to financial advice is a benefit of fund membership and is not separately charged for".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND