Super funds make robo-advice a means to an end

financial planning superannuation ASFA ASIC robo-advice fintech

23 May 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

It has been confirmed that many superannuation funds see digital advice as a loss-leading tool via which they will channel members towards more comprehensive offerings for which they can charge.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has revealed in a response to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) consultation paper on regulating digital financial product advice, that many of its members see the provision of robo-advice as a means to an end.

"The trend appears to be that automated advice will become an additional service offering of the incumbent advice and product providers, many of whom are superannuation funds and ASFA members," the submission said.

"The opportunity then for new fintech providers it seems, is to become a supplier and/or authorised representative of existing AFS [Australian financial services] licensees who remain responsible for the advice being delivered."

The submission said it was envisaged that for superannuation funds, digital advice would most commonly be used to deliver "intra fund" advice, often at no cost to the member.

"Funds will absorb these costs in order to provide a member service and value-add in the context of having to compete in an environment increasingly becoming one of consumer choice," it said.

"Funds are hoping that digital delivery of intra fund advice will provide a more effective means of engaging with members in a lower cost manner than they have in the past — face-to-face and/or over the phone," the ASFA response said.

"Similarly, they are expecting that digital advice will be a first port of call for members seeking advice, later being channelled into more comprehensive offerings that will attract charge."

The ASFA response suggests that ASIC needs to provide greater clarity around a number of issues, including the responsibility of a "person" in a digital advice process.

The response claims the ASIC guidance does not cover situations where a degree of "human" intervention occurs, and if that occurs, who can it be done by.

"It is our view that, accountability and responsibility is not removed by automation, however like traditional advice delivery channels those that support an advice process may not be a personal advice authority holder themselves," the ASFA response said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 9 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 7 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 10 hours ago