Super funds falling short on ethical options

super funds superannuation funds superannuation ratings

5 June 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds aren’t providing adequate high-quality, ethical and sustainable investment options, a survey of advisers has found, with the fact the industry doesn’t require that funds disclose their underlying investments one possible reason why.

The survey, which was completed by advisers representing over 3,300 clients with funds of over $1.5 billion in ethical investments, found that many funds fell short of the demands of the average ethical investor.

Chair of the Ethical Advisers Co-operative (EAC), Terry Pinnell, blamed this on “green-washing”, meaning that funds could claim to have ethical investment options without having to substantially prove the claim.

“At present there are currently no industry requirements for funds to disclose to members those underlying companies in which their money is invested,” EAC said. “Like the ‘free-range’ eggs controversies of recent years, this has created a situation ripe for exploitation by businesses which claim to meet consumer demands yet are not required to provide consumers with the means of verifying their claims.”

EAC used the survey results, which were sourced from its members, to award funds ‘green leaf’ ratings based on the reality of the funds’ investments compared to the expectations of advisers’ average ethical investor.

Some big super funds received ratings of two ‘green leaves’ out of a possible five, with options ‘ethical’ options from AustralianSuper, UniSuper, First State Super, Hostplus and Sunsuper all amongst those awarded these low scores. Future Super and Australian Ethical Super were the two highest performers, receiving 4.5 and four ‘leaves’ respectively.

There was little consistency to the ratings however, with a mixture of super funds and fund options being rated and just 12 offerings in total receiving scores. Considering the plethora options and funds available, this could hardly be called a meaningful sample.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 days 16 hours ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 days 16 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months 1 week ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 weeks 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

3 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has named its new chief executive, who is set to replace retiring interim CEO Greg Yanco in March....

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS