Super funds deny early access to super liquidity concerns

super funds Qantas Super IOOF Holdings funds sa

17 November 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Representatives from Qantas Super, IOOF Holdings and Funds SA have confirmed the early release of Super (ERS) did not have a significant impact on their liquidity.

This was despite negative media attention at the time and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s (APRA) confirmation that some funds had experienced material impacts to liquidity.

In its December 2020 bulletin, APRA said over $6 billion of Australians’ retirement savings were withdrawn between late April and early May 2020.

Speaking at a webinar, Qantas Superannuation’s head of investment operations, Daniel Healy, said Qantas Super was included in negative media attention as fear spread in the community that there would be significant liquidity stress with the standing down of airline staff.

“The quantum of members taking up the scheme would have had to be many, many, many times more than what it was for us to have had any liquidity concern,” said Healy.

He said the only real impact on the fund had been that it required higher monitoring and more oversight processes.

Healy’s sentiment was echoed by Martin Walsh, IOOF Holdings’ trustee board independent director, who said the ERS did not have a material impact on the size of IOOF’s super fund but that it caused a strain on operations as a result of eligibility checks.

Matthew Baynes, senior manager, investment accounting and operations, Funds SA, said the impact was minimal as the vast majority of funds under the Funds SA umbrella were public sector super funds whose members were paid during their stand-down period.

“There were a few – and we only know this by talking with the public sector schemes – but they were certainly masked amongst the accumulation money coming in so we didn’t notice anything at all,” said Baynes.

Healy said the most significant issue was asset allocation during this time of instability – not liquidity.

“The real issue that was overlooked was just keeping track of our asset allocation, our actual assets versus our strategic position, making sure that we're in ranges, making sure that our rebalancing programme was kicking in and working as it should have.

“And that was driven by the member movements and even funds leaving the plan with the early release scheme - that was something that you really needed to have a close handle on.”

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 12 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 16 hours ago