Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super funds criticised on investment processes, board composition

cooper-review/cent/superannuation-funds/super-funds/director/trustee/

2 September 2010
| By Caroline Munro |






Superannuation funds will have to pay closer attention to decision-making processes and board composition in light of the Cooper Review recommendations, according to Russell Investments.

The Russell Investments' July Governance Survey, based on interviews with 40 superannuation funds, revealed only 18 per cent of respondents are considering changing their current decision-making processes, despite the survey revealing a lack of delegation on investments decisions. This lack of delegation can slow down implementation, harm efficiency and create a serious overlap of responsibility, according to Keith Knapman, director of investment consulting at Russell Investments.

“While the survey shows good governance practices prevail on the whole, many boards are still ineffective in delegating to their investment committees,” Knapman said. “There is also some way to go in composing a board with an appropriate level of capability and independence.”

Some 86 per cent of funds surveyed were confident their decision-making processes were suitable and only 18 per cent stated they were actively considering a change. Knapman conceded funds could be waiting to see whether the Cooper Review recommendations would be implemented and whether change will be forced on them.

The survey also revealed 53 per cent of the funds had no independent directors and as such they would be on the look out considering the Cooper Review recommendation that all funds have at least one independent director.

The survey also studied whether members of trustee boards were appropriately selected based on their skills and experience, and revealed 70 per cent of funds had between one and four members with a finance or investment background, while only 20 per cent had more than five members with finance or investment backgrounds. Some 5 per cent had none at all.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND