Super disclosure regime to harm retirement outcomes

AIST Eva Scheerlinck retirement income

9 September 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The Government’s proposed disclosure requirements for superannuation funds will negatively impact retirement income, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).

The disclosure regime, set to come into effect on 31 December, would require super funds to disclose the precise value of privately held assets.

AIST chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said while the association supported disclosure on a wide-ranging basis, it needed to be done in a way that did not prejudice members’ best financial interests.

“Requiring super funds to disclose the precise value of privately held assets will compromise their ability to effectively implement investment strategies on behalf of members – members’ retirement outcomes will be harmed,” she said.

“Signalling the precise value of unlisted assets will enable other institutional investors, including overseas buyers including sovereign wealth funds and hedge funds to receive an unfair advantage over Australian super funds. This may risk co-investment opportunities and ultimately may jeopardise Australian jobs and returns to Australian super fund members.

“Unbelievably, the Government would be giving overseas investors a leg up at the expense of Australian fund members.”

AIST said if implemented in its current form, the regime would:

  • Give an advantage to foreign buyers (who were not required to disclose specific values) over Australian super funds – this may increase foreign ownership of these assets over time and jeopardise Australian jobs;
  • Make Australian super capital less attractive to investment partners and reduces access to investment opportunities;
  • Prevent Australian super funds from maximising the sale price when they were selling an unlisted asset as buyers would have information on the vendor’s current carrying value;
  • Give foreign buyers an advantage when they were bidding for other assets in the same market as those held by Australian super funds as they would have a clear signal of value;
  • Have a negative impact on the carrying value of assets held by Australian State and Federal Governments where interests were held alongside Australian super funds;
  • May lead to opportunistic sale approaches with public/shareholder pressure to sell the asset at the disclosed value; and
  • Under the proposed derivates disclosure, a hedge fund would be able to use disclosed information against an Australian super fund, adversely effecting pricing and returns.
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 3 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 7 hours ago