Super bills ‘leave pass’ for banks

commonwealth-bank/policy/superannuation/SuperRatings/

15 September 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation bills reintroduced by the Federal Government into Parliament yesterday pose a risk to the not-for-profit superannuation sector and give the banks a “leave pass” on new transparency and disclosure requirements, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).

Responding to the government’s reintroduction of the bill, ISA argued the government’s agenda was not about improving governance and transparency but furthering the commercial interests of the banks.

“The Strengthening Trustee Arrangements Bill will dismantle the successful industry super and not-for-profit super governance model,” ISA said.

“The Improving Accountability and Member Outcomes in Superannuation Bill 2017 will enhance trustee obligations and regulatory powers in the default super sector but not 83 per cent of retail sector assets dominated by big bank-owned funds.” 

The government’s package includes making super funds more transparent on how they spend members’ money through new reporting of expenses, giving workers choice of their own super fund if they were currently prevented from doing so due to enterprise bargaining agreements or workplace determinations, and legislating a consistent minimum standard for one-third independent directors, including an independent chair.

ISA also argued the government had not presented any evidence their proposals would improve members’ returns.

“The evidence is clear: for the 10 years to 30 June 2017, SuperRatings monthly data shows, on average industry super funds have outperformed bank-owned super funds by more than two per cent a year,” it said.

It also cited examples where banks have had to provide customers compensation including ANZ paying an extra $10.5 million to 160,000 customers after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found it had incorrectly processed members’ super contributions and failed to deal with lost inactive member balances correctly.

It also cited the Commonwealth Bank (CBA) having to repay an estimated $105.6 million for charging fees where no advice was provided.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS