Study examines SMSF costs

self-managed super fund SMSFs ASIC superannuation funds SMSF australian securities and investments commission director

14 May 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A study currently being conducted by the University of Adelaide may allow both current and prospective self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees to make greater cost comparisons, according to Plaza Financial director Peter Hogan.

"As part of a Ph.D program they're currently running, the Adelaide University is in the middle of doing a review of the costs of running superannuation funds based on data for about 25,000 funds," he said.

"And what they're trying to do is compare the typical, average costs involved in a self-managed super fund compared to an MER (management expense ratio) of 1.5 per cent or 2 per cent that a managed fund might charge, and then whatever the various charges of the industry funds are."

Hogan said that the study was also likely to provide prospective trustees with a far better guide, not only to the costs involved in an SMSF, but also to what sort of opening account balance they were likely to require.

"The $200,000 mark per fund number is one that's been around for a long time," he said.

"I think ASIC (the Australian Securities and Investments Commission) was the first to propose it as being a minimum fund size.

"But, realistically, it was done on some very loose assumptions and wasn't as rigorous an examination of the various costs involved in running a fund as compared to what the Adelaide University is attempting."

According to Hogan, a figure of $200,000 may even turn out to be too conservative.

"Some of the early indications from the Adelaide University study have suggested that maybe $150,000 might be closer to the mark," he said.

"However, much lower than that and you're clearly going to be behind the 8-ball compared to any other superannuation offering out there."

For Hogan, $200,000 is the magic number for good reason.

"When you get $200,000 or more in a self-managed super fund, your costs are pretty much fixed costs," he said.

"So as the account balances grow, the ratio of those fees against the income earned, the account balance or even the assets held is significantly reduced."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS