Stronger Super tranche approach raises concerns

stronger super mysuper FOFA mercer government parliamentary joint committee federal government

7 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government has been warned against seeking to deliver its Stronger Super bills, including MySuper, in a series of legislative tranches without allowing the industry an extended transition period.

The warning is contained in a submission from global financial services house, Mercer, to the Parliamentary Joint Committee reviewing the MySuper legislation, and has urged a transition period extending up to 18 months beyond 1 July 2013.

The Mercer warning on the multiple tranche to the Stronger Super legislation follows on from similar criticism of the Government's two-tranche approach to its Future of Financial Advice bills and speculation that it may require a third tranche.

"The current enquiry relates only to the MySuper element, however, we note the MySuper Bill 2011 only encompasses a part of the legislative package that will be necessary to cover MySuper," the Mercer submission said.

"As can be seen [in] the Explanatory Memorandum (EM), there is a considerable number of items which need to be covered in subsequent tranches of legislation.

"We note the list in the EM does not appear to be exhaustive. Legislation covering the other components of the reform will also impact on MySuper."

The Mercer submission said the total package of legislation represented a significant shift in legislative requirements for superannuation, and each of the four components would require significant work by trustees to ensure current practices and fund design were modified to comply with the new requirements.

"Whilst we appreciate the Government is trying to get as much detail out as early as possible, the lack of detail on a number of issues is creating a serious dilemma for superannuation funds as they try and develop benefit designs to operate in the MySuper environment - both MySuper products and non-MySuper (Choice), in an extremely short timeframe.

"Whilst the level of difficulty will vary depending on the type of fund and its current structure, it is critical that all details be made available as soon as possible," it said.

It warned that the short time frame was expected to have adverse implications for trustees, employers and employees.

The submission said this was likely to be particularly challenging for those funds that intended to have multiple MySuper products and multiple Choice products to redesign, and suggested that even the extended transition period it had recommended might prove a challenge for such funds.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 1 hour ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 15 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

19 hours 56 minutes ago