SPAA recommends SG opt-out

SPAA superannuation guarantee treasury

17 November 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The Self-Managed Superannuation Fund Professionals Association (SPAA) has submitted a policy suggestion to Treasury, requesting an ‘opt out’ provision to the superannuation guarantee (SG) for those at risk of exceeding the concessional contribution (CC) caps.

The association said today Australians with multiple employers — for example those who engage in contract work and those with multiple directorships — were being unfairly penalised by the system.

SPAA chief Andrea Slattery (pictured) said while the association was a “strong supporter of the 9 per cent superannuation guarantee”, the group had become “increasingly concerned about its unintended consequences” for some super fund members where the CC caps were concerned.

As a result, the association wants to see employees able to ‘opt out’ of the SG where it is evident they are likely to breach the caps. SPAA proposed affected employees be able to elect in writing to their employer to be exempt from the SG contributions, with evidence showing the employees’ CC caps would be exceeded if the contribution were made.

SPAA proposed to Treasury the election should be required to be made each financial year and remain in force for the entire financial year unless revoked by the employee.

SPAA described this as a “commonsense solution” to the “unfair and unjust” taxation of contributions under the CC cap rules.

The controversial CC caps introduced in 2007 restrict CCs to $50,000 per year for those aged 50 or over at 1 July, 2007. From June 30 2012, the CC cap for all age groups will be $25,000. All employers are legally obliged to contribute 9 per cent of an employee’s salary to super, and employers are not required to be aware of the contributions made by other employers of the staff member.

The tax on the amount exceeding the caps can be as high as 93 per cent in some cases, and at a minimum of 31.5 per cent.

SPAA said some of those being affected by contributions from multiple employers include those in the information technology, mining and medical professions, where arrangements which see contractors classified as employees for SG purposes are common practice. People with multiple directorships are also likely to be affected as a result of receiving remuneration from a number of unrelated sources.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 5 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 5 days ago