SPAA recommends SG opt-out

SPAA/superannuation-guarantee/treasury/

17 November 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The Self-Managed Superannuation Fund Professionals Association (SPAA) has submitted a policy suggestion to Treasury, requesting an ‘opt out’ provision to the superannuation guarantee (SG) for those at risk of exceeding the concessional contribution (CC) caps.

The association said today Australians with multiple employers — for example those who engage in contract work and those with multiple directorships — were being unfairly penalised by the system.

SPAA chief Andrea Slattery (pictured) said while the association was a “strong supporter of the 9 per cent superannuation guarantee”, the group had become “increasingly concerned about its unintended consequences” for some super fund members where the CC caps were concerned.

As a result, the association wants to see employees able to ‘opt out’ of the SG where it is evident they are likely to breach the caps. SPAA proposed affected employees be able to elect in writing to their employer to be exempt from the SG contributions, with evidence showing the employees’ CC caps would be exceeded if the contribution were made.

SPAA proposed to Treasury the election should be required to be made each financial year and remain in force for the entire financial year unless revoked by the employee.

SPAA described this as a “commonsense solution” to the “unfair and unjust” taxation of contributions under the CC cap rules.

The controversial CC caps introduced in 2007 restrict CCs to $50,000 per year for those aged 50 or over at 1 July, 2007. From June 30 2012, the CC cap for all age groups will be $25,000. All employers are legally obliged to contribute 9 per cent of an employee’s salary to super, and employers are not required to be aware of the contributions made by other employers of the staff member.

The tax on the amount exceeding the caps can be as high as 93 per cent in some cases, and at a minimum of 31.5 per cent.

SPAA said some of those being affected by contributions from multiple employers include those in the information technology, mining and medical professions, where arrangements which see contractors classified as employees for SG purposes are common practice. People with multiple directorships are also likely to be affected as a result of receiving remuneration from a number of unrelated sources.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS