SPAA points to fatal flaw in super tax concessions

taxation/SPAA/superannuation-contributions/government/smsf-professionals/

1 July 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The methodology used to measure superannuation tax concessions is "fatally flawed", according to Andrea Slattery, CEO of the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA).

Indeed for Slattery, it misinforms the debate around retirement income policy.

"Measuring the concessions as tax expenditure using a comprehensive income benchmark is misleading and biased against concessions, because any derivation from income being taxed at a taxpayer's marginal tax rate is regarded as a cost to government revenue," she said.

"This ignores superannuation's primary purpose, providing retirement income and decreasing reliance on the Government for retirement income support."

Slattery said that while the current methodology was "theoretically correct" under a comprehensive income benchmark, it failed to include future government savings from reduced spending on the age pension, or tax revenue gained from earnings of superannuation investments or benefits taxed on withdrawal.

"SPAA believes this skews the debate regarding the level of concessions and the appropriateness of concessional taxation of superannuation contributions as an incentive for people to save for their retirement," she said.

According to Slattery, the short-term budget forecast figures that used four-year revenue estimates for changes to the concessions, and a similar focus of the Tax Expenditure Statements on single income years, were the wrong way to assess superannuation concessions.

"These short-term costings create myopic views of the superannuation tax concessions that often support arguments to reduce the concessions," she said. "Instead, what are needed are longer-term forecasts to assess the proper policy settings for the tax concessions."

Slattery said that SPAA recommended that an expenditure tax benchmark be used to estimate the cost of the superannuation tax concessions.

"It would be more appropriate for estimating tax concessions, as an expenditure tax benchmark has a more appropriate focus on the provision and taxation of superannuation benefits rather than the tax forgone for the concessions," she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS