SPAA points to fatal flaw in super tax concessions

taxation SPAA superannuation contributions government smsf professionals

1 July 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The methodology used to measure superannuation tax concessions is "fatally flawed", according to Andrea Slattery, CEO of the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA).

Indeed for Slattery, it misinforms the debate around retirement income policy.

"Measuring the concessions as tax expenditure using a comprehensive income benchmark is misleading and biased against concessions, because any derivation from income being taxed at a taxpayer's marginal tax rate is regarded as a cost to government revenue," she said.

"This ignores superannuation's primary purpose, providing retirement income and decreasing reliance on the Government for retirement income support."

Slattery said that while the current methodology was "theoretically correct" under a comprehensive income benchmark, it failed to include future government savings from reduced spending on the age pension, or tax revenue gained from earnings of superannuation investments or benefits taxed on withdrawal.

"SPAA believes this skews the debate regarding the level of concessions and the appropriateness of concessional taxation of superannuation contributions as an incentive for people to save for their retirement," she said.

According to Slattery, the short-term budget forecast figures that used four-year revenue estimates for changes to the concessions, and a similar focus of the Tax Expenditure Statements on single income years, were the wrong way to assess superannuation concessions.

"These short-term costings create myopic views of the superannuation tax concessions that often support arguments to reduce the concessions," she said. "Instead, what are needed are longer-term forecasts to assess the proper policy settings for the tax concessions."

Slattery said that SPAA recommended that an expenditure tax benchmark be used to estimate the cost of the superannuation tax concessions.

"It would be more appropriate for estimating tax concessions, as an expenditure tax benchmark has a more appropriate focus on the provision and taxation of superannuation benefits rather than the tax forgone for the concessions," she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 2 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 16 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

20 hours 40 minutes ago