SPAA maintains resistance to SMSF compensation scheme

SPAA/SMSFs/smsf-professionals/SMSF/smsf-essentials/assistant-treasurer/superannuation-industry/

19 February 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

On the back of comments made by the Assistant Treasurer, Senator Arthur Sinodinos, stating that the self-managed super fund (SMSF) sector needed to be 'self-reliant' and that trustees needed to understand this as they had chosen to be responsible for their own decision making, the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) has announced that it remains steadfastly opposed to any form of compensation scheme for SMSFs. 

Commenting further, Andrea Slattery, CEO of SPAA, said that the industry body concurred with the Minister.  

"On this issue and the issue of raising the standards of advice and competency, SPAA concurs with the Minister," she said.

"The guiding philosophy underpinning self-managed super is that trustees/members take responsibility for their own retirement income outcomes. 

"By opting to go down the SMSF path, trustees/members have to appreciate that decisions rest with them, although they can get advice, either directly or indirectly, from specialist SMSF advisers." 

Slattery said any compensation scheme should only be part of a broader financial services scheme where clients have suffered financial losses because of the misconduct or insolvency of a provider of a product or service. 

She added that the compensation should only then be funded by a levy imposed on that industry sector where the misconduct occurred. 

An all too common misconception, according to Slattery, was that SMSFs were not entitled to compensation when fraud or theft occurred. 

 "This is incorrect," she said.

"Although SMSFs don't have access to compensation under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS) Act that is available, at the Minister's discretion and only where it is in the public's best interest to approve compensation for APRA-regulated funds, there are other legal avenues that SMSFs can pursue. 

"These include but are not limited to personal indemnity schemes; actions under the Corporations law; action in the courts to obtain compensation for damages; the Financial Ombudsman; and the banking and credit legislation," Slattery explained.

"Although these legal options are not foolproof, they do give trustees/members options when there are instances of fraud or theft. 

"But then again, no current scheme is foolproof." 

Originally published by SMSF Essentials.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS