SPAA issues warning on simplistic disclosure

SPAA/smsf-sector/smsf-essentials/SMSFs/ASIC/SMSF/chief-executive-officer/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

27 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Self Managed Super Fund Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) has outlined its stance on the disclosure of SMSF risks in its submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) on Consultation Paper CP216. 

In that submission, Andrea Slattery, chief executive officer of SPAA, said the organisation welcomed ASIC's goal to improve the standard of advice given to prospective SMSF trustees. 

"This includes disclosures on the risks associated with SMSFs," she said.

"However, the requirements in the ASIC paper may not achieve those goals or be appropriate in the circumstances.

"We believe the general impetus to improve disclosure in order to reduce risks for consumers is merited and will strengthen the integrity of the SMSF sector but ASIC's recommendation that advisers must provide a warning that SMSFs are not entitled to Part 23 compensation under the SIS Act is too simplistic," continued Slattery.

"This approach ignores the complex nature of compensation for funds affected by fraud or theft.

"APRA-regulated funds are not guaranteed compensation under the SIS Act for fraud or theft and the fact that SMSFs do have other avenues for seeking compensation for theft or fraud has been ignored." 

Slattery said that in its submission SPAA had pointed ASIC to the uncertain nature of Part 23 compensation for APRA-regulated funds.  

"The proposed disclosure perpetuates the common misconception that APRA-regulated funds will definitely receive compensation if the fund is a victim of fraud or theft," she said.

"Instead, we believe any warning that SMSFs are not entitled to Part 23 compensation should be made in the broader context of advisers discussing all compensation arrangements available to SMSFs." 

Slattery said that SPAA's submission supported the other SMSF risk disclosures suggested by ASIC but warned that these risks often depended on the individual circumstances of the SMSF and their members. 

Originally published by SMSF Essentials.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS