SPAA concern over SMSF audit changes

SPAA SMSFs smsf professionals trustee SMSF chairman

7 November 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image
expand image

Proposed amendments to regulations on how long an auditor has to present a report to self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees are unnecessarily complicated, according to the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA).

SPAA said it supports the initiative to amend the regulations and ensure auditors do not contravene the Superannuation Industry Supervision (SIS) Act regulations due to circumstances beyond their control, but had several major drawbacks.

Specifically, the proposals are unnecessarily complicated, only apply in certain circumstances, are very difficult to understand and impose unnecessarily strict timeframes on auditors who were appointed late, according to SPAA chairman Sharyn Long.

Currently, an auditor can theoretically face a gaol term if they don't provide an audit the day before the annual return is due, but under the new proposals an auditor has 30 days from the date of their appointments if that occurs within 31 days of the annual return due date.

The amendments also propose that when an auditor is "appointed late, requests information (but only documents, and only if the request is in writing) more than 21 days prior to the due date and the trustee does not provide this information within 7 days of the due date, then the auditor must complete the audit and provide the report within 7 days of the date of receipt of the information," SPAA stated.

SPAA said the proposed prescriptive time frames are unrealistic, commercially unviable, inconsistent with codes of professional and ethical conduct, and may discourage auditors from accepting certain audit engagements.

"The proposed amendments only apply to a request for 'documents', therefore excluding requests for clarification of transactions, dealing, or the fund's general activities, including compliance matters," Long said.

"It seems inequitable that a different extension and resulting penalty regime would exist between auditors who require documents to finalise the audit and those who are seeking clarification of certain matters in order to finalise the audit."

It would be impossible to complete most complex audits within 30 days of appointment, and it is unreasonable to expect auditors to complete audits and provide opinions within seven days of receipt of documents requested from the trustee, SPAA stated.

"SPAA believes that rather than limiting the time auditors have to complete audits, the regulations should provide auditors with the flexibility to properly complete the audit, and to provide the necessary audit report as soon as practically possible," Long said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 2 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks 1 day ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS