SMSFs need not frighten

investment advice planners superannuation funds chief executive officer

17 August 2000
| By John Wilkinson |

Planners should not be put off from entering the self-managed funds advice market by complex legislation, says PSI Group chief executive officer Paul Kolatchew.

"Planners get frightened of self-managed funds because of the legislation, but who cares?" Kolatchew told the recent Matrix conference in Ayers Rock.

"Accountants know the technical details, all planners need to know is the basics."

Kolatchew says planners should sell the benefits of a self-managed fund, not the technical details.

"In most cases commonsense and experience will get you through," he says.

All a planner needs to know about self-managed funds is that they must have less than five members. Kolatchew adds: "Keep it in the family.

"The purpose of the fund is to provide benefits for the members in retirement," he says.

"This means following the general investment principles for DIY which involves things like not investing in personal assets."

Personal assets usually include items such as holiday homes, cars, artworks and antiques.

The market for self-managed funds is huge. There are 201,000 superannuation funds in Australia of which 197,000 are self-managed. According to PSI, $55 billion is invested in these funds.

Returns for the average fund are about 4 per cent because the trustees do not receive investment advice, Kolatchew says.

"There is no real investment advice as the accountants (who usually run the funds) are too busy," he says. "For planners there are three advice opportunities: pre-retirement (accumulation), post-retirement (income streams) and post-death (grandchildren)."

Planners can earn fees from a fund by providing investment advice, risk insurance for the fund and possibly fund administration.

Kolatchew says a planner can earn fees on the basis of charging a 1 per cent fee based on the value of the assets in the fund. He recommends clients with less than $100,000 superannuation should not be in self-managed funds.

He quotes an example of a fund with $500,000 of assets. The planner could charge a first- year lodgment fee of 1 per cent ($5000) and first-year investment advice fee of 1 per cent ($5000). This would give first-year earnings of $10,000 and subsequent years could again be charged at 1 per cent, giving a trail of $5000 a year.

"The lifetime value of the client grows, the long-term asset value of the client grows and the value of the planner's business grows," he says.

If the planner wants to outsource the technical side of the fund, Kolatchew suggests the planner should use somebody they can trust … or they might lose the business.

"You want someone who can give you iron-clad guarantees, work with you as part of the team and who specialises in superannuation," he says, adding that "accountants do not fall into these categories."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS