SMSF Taskforce highlights ‘poor’ advice pockets: PIPA

investment advice SMSF ASIC financial planning smsf professionals SMSFs SPAA peter kell australian securities and investments commission chairman chief executive

22 April 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) has welcomed the findings of the regulator's SMSF (self-managed super fund) Taskforce, but says trustees still require specialised property investment advice.

PIPA acknowledged that the majority of financial advice provided to investors in relation to establishing an SMSF was found to be ‘adequate' by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

The industry body noted however that there were also pockets of ‘poor' advice, particularly in regards to recommendations that investors set up an SMSF in order to invest in real property.

In relation to the taskforce findings, ASIC commissioner Peter Kell stated that regulatory action would be taken when examples of unlicensed SMSF advice or misleading marketing were identified.

"As ASIC would be fully aware, reports of Australian investors suffering at the hands of unscrupulous marketeers are all too common, and such cases have the potential to explode as interest in property investment via SMSFs continues to grow," PIPA chairman Ben Kingsley said.

He said financial planners and accountants lack understanding and formal education in relation to real property and require more training in relation to SMSF property selection.

"One, they can refer their client to someone who does have formal property investment advice accreditations — or they can undertake their own formal qualifications in order to deliver qualified property investment advice and a more all-inclusive service."

Analysing the SMSF Taskforce findings, the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) cautioned the industry about reading too much into the report, as the research was based on reviews of 100 pieces of advice to low-balance SMSFs.

SPAA chief executive Andrea Slattery added the report related to those advisers who are "prolific spruikers of property and borrowing" and those who have had consumer complaints made against them.

"This is a very small subset of SMSF advice, only addressing the really risky end of advice to the SMSF industry," she said.

"What has to be remembered is that there are nearly half a million SMSFs, so this research should not be regarded as defining all professional advice in the SMSF space."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

5 days 5 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS