Should super funds be held to same standards as advisers?

superannuation WSSA productivity commission mysuper

19 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation fund trustees need to be held to the same standards as financial advisers when providing information around the manner in which premiums inside superannuation may erode member balances, according to the Workplace Super Specialists Association (WSSA).

In a submission filed with the Productivity Commission (PC), the WSSA said that when superannuation funds were providing information to members about insurance balance erosion trade-offs, it was essential that a balanced argument was provided.

“Superannuation funds should be held to the same standards as an adviser would be in this aspect,” it said. “Showing the erosion in account balances is just a cost argument and must be compared with the difference in outcome to a member should an insurance claim arise.”

The WSSA submission argued that a large opt-out of insurance cover would inevitably lead to more people becoming dependant on family support or social welfare, with more people living below the poverty line, which was not good for Australian society or for the economy.

Elsewhere in its submission, the WSSA recommended encouraging higher levels of fund member engagement with their super through education and financial advice but suggested that life-cycle products represented the next best solution.

“As not all fund members will be engaged, the next best solution is to allow trustees to provide life-cycle products,” it said. “If a member is invested in a life-cycle fund over their working life, the benefits of the trustee changing the investment allocation over their life could be significant.”

The WSSA said one of the major problems it had with the MySuper legislation was that it placed all members in the same investment option with employers having no ability to tailor investment selection to suit their workforce.

“It seems impossible to us that trustees can make appropriate decisions, in the best interest of members, when members in the MySuper fund could range between 16 to 75 years old,” the submission said.

“Life-cycle products are designed to reduce investment risk for people as they get older, assuming they have a reduced appetite for risk. While this will not be the case for all members it is a better solution than doing nothing, as investment losses in the later stages of life can not necessarily be recovered over time; particularly if the member commences an income stream,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 day 10 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 6 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

9 hours ago

Professional services group AZ NGA has made its first acquisition since announcing a $240 million strategic partnership with US manager Oaktree Capital Management in Sept...

1 day 13 hours ago